Punitive Damages Against a Rogue LLC Manager
Punitive damages are available “where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice.” They are…
Bankruptcy Stay Prevents Removal of Limited Partnership’s General Partner
Under California’s Uniform Limited Partnership Act, a general partner’s bankruptcy filing causes the general partner’s automatic dissociation from the limited partnership and termination of management rights. …
LLC Manager Causing the LLC to Pay Its Debt to a Related Entity is Not a Breach of Fiduciary Duty
The spectrum of LLC manager conduct that potentially constitutes an actionable breach of fiduciary duty is broad and varied, and the claims are almost always resolved…
Can a California Court Order Managerial Removal for a Delaware LLC?
Under the “internal affairs doctrine,” the laws of an LLC’s state of formation will usually govern matters concerning its internal affairs — i.e., matters peculiar to…
A Poke Bowl Full of Breached LLC Duties
LLC litigation involves many complex issues, and it’s not always easy to allege a claim properly. Some cases never get out of the starting gate, with…
Another LLC Attorney Disqualified Due to “Conflict of Authority”
A prior LLC Jungle post covered the Court of Appeal’s seminal opinion in the Jarvis v. Jarvis case here: Why Having “Co-Managers” for Your LLC is a Terrible…
You Come at the LLC Manager, You Best Not Miss
In a popular TV series (The Wire), a well-known quote is: “You come at the king, you best not miss.” The idea is that if you’re…
LLCs Can Assert Offensive Claims Against Members
In “business divorce” litigation involving LLCs, it is common to see a disgruntled LLC member asserting claims against the LLC’s manager. Depending on the type of…
The “Business Judgment Rule” Applies in LLCs Too
Corporate directors have long relied on the “business judgment rule,” under which their decisions are presumed to have been made “on an informed basis, in good…
LLC Member Acting for LLC Without Authority Is Not “Protected Activity” Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute
California’s anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16) aims to protect defendants from meritless lawsuits designed to chill “protected activity” — i.e., the exercise of…